61
Quest for Infamy / Re: In search of the new three rooms in 1.1
« on: February 22, 2015, 04:48:57 PM »
You can't get into the barracks through the front door.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
1 Like
62
Quest for Infamy / Re: In search of the new three rooms in 1.1
« on: February 21, 2015, 12:51:39 PM »
For that interior room, you just need an arrow in the right direction, at night.
For the garden--you may need to talk to someone first--I don't remember how Blackthorne set that one up. It is indeed a place that needs to be floated to, though it used to be accessible by other means.
For the garden--you may need to talk to someone first--I don't remember how Blackthorne set that one up. It is indeed a place that needs to be floated to, though it used to be accessible by other means.
63
Quest for Infamy / Re: Revisiting the five steps to BT
« on: January 26, 2015, 08:52:12 PM »
I'm glad it was you, Goatmeal. 
64
IQ Chat / Re: Infamou$ Quest$
« on: January 19, 2015, 02:36:18 PM »
I'd love to have something like that, too!
There actually are a few bits and pieces of QFI merchandise around, but you have to hunt to find them. I bought some postcards that Steve had made with some QFI backgrounds on them; it was more or less something he had submitted to a printing website as a test, but didn't realize that they actually were available on that website's store. I don't remember what site it was though. Steve might be able to tell you.
There actually are a few bits and pieces of QFI merchandise around, but you have to hunt to find them. I bought some postcards that Steve had made with some QFI backgrounds on them; it was more or less something he had submitted to a printing website as a test, but didn't realize that they actually were available on that website's store. I don't remember what site it was though. Steve might be able to tell you.
65
Banter and Chit-Chat! / Re: The Hobbit Rant (SPOILERS!)
« on: December 29, 2014, 08:31:23 PM »
People take this shit way too seriously. As an adult, I would not want to watch a simplified, child-oriented version of the Hobbit--the old cartoon bores me to tears. So, if they can amp up the sex, violence, and darkness for a more adult audience, I'm all for it. I'd also be okay if they swapped the elves for children of the forest, the dwarves for wildlings, and changed the name of Middle Earth to Westeros. Also, more boobs, please.
66
Banter and Chit-Chat! / Re: Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays!
« on: December 28, 2014, 04:19:53 PM »
I knitted myself a sweater out of all the shaved pubes that have accumulated since the end of our Kickstarter.
67
Banter and Chit-Chat! / Re: You know what really ticks me off?
« on: December 26, 2014, 06:26:48 PM »
I banned the dick who posted that hairy scrotum image.
68
Banter and Chit-Chat! / Re: Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays!
« on: December 24, 2014, 07:27:28 PM »
69
Banter and Chit-Chat! / Re: You know what really ticks me off?
« on: December 22, 2014, 01:45:20 PM »...business...juice...squeeze...effort...please...handful...backwards...fuck...it works.
Lambonius: Selectively editing Bt's posts to implicitly refer to masturbation since 2008.
You're welcome.
70
Quest for Infamy / Re: ok why is rohem in this old painting!?
« on: December 17, 2014, 04:35:35 PM »
He's the neckbeard that broke a thousand hearts.
71
Banter and Chit-Chat! / Re: Odd Gentlemen's "King's Quest" teaser
« on: December 09, 2014, 04:22:11 AM »
RPG Codex's thread on the new KQ is a hilarious read.
http://www.rpgcodex.net/forums/index.php?threads/new-kings-quest-game-by-the-odd-gentlemen-aka-sierra-reloaded-massive-decline-everything-is-shit.95074/page-6
Also, they explicitly made a point of moving it out of their Adventure Gaming subforum and into their General Gaming forum after the reveal trailer dropped. hahaha
http://www.rpgcodex.net/forums/index.php?threads/new-kings-quest-game-by-the-odd-gentlemen-aka-sierra-reloaded-massive-decline-everything-is-shit.95074/page-6
Also, they explicitly made a point of moving it out of their Adventure Gaming subforum and into their General Gaming forum after the reveal trailer dropped. hahaha
72
Banter and Chit-Chat! / Re: Odd Gentlemen's "King's Quest" teaser
« on: December 09, 2014, 12:18:54 AM »
Heh...I know; we did the same thing in QFI.
73
Banter and Chit-Chat! / Re: Odd Gentlemen's "King's Quest" teaser
« on: December 08, 2014, 04:17:15 PM »
I have been letting my hate flow through me with this one. It sustains me.
74
Banter and Chit-Chat! / Re: Odd Gentlemen's "King's Quest" teaser
« on: December 08, 2014, 12:31:03 PM »
I went on several no-holds-barred rants about it last night in various forums. I feel a little like a college girl who wakes up in an unfamiliar bedroom after a night of wild partying.
75
Banter and Chit-Chat! / Re: Odd Gentlemen's "King's Quest" teaser
« on: December 06, 2014, 06:13:14 PM »
I'm guessing we'll see very little actual gameplay in the coming year before release. This project is about one thing: Activision cashing in on the Sierra name. This is a cash grab looking to dupe the more dimwitted of King's Quest fans into a quick sale based on the name and nostalgia. The game is likely much more geared towards the audience that made games like The Cave and Brothers successful (neither of which are adventure games.) Mark my words: they're going to be as vague as possible about the gameplay so as not to turn away potential customers. They're going to push this as a "new age" adventure game, even though it's clearly not, and idiot fans are going to lap it up like Christmas gravy.