61
IQ Chat / Re: This is very fascinating, You are an overly professional blogger.
« on: December 21, 2014, 03:35:42 PM »
Maybe this is Russia's response for sanctions -- spamming throughout the internet. 
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
62
IQ Chat / Re: Hummel's speaking portrait question
« on: December 18, 2014, 08:11:09 AM »
That's what I thought too and I think BT said that the inspiration was mr Baker and someones' uncle (forgive me for not remembering whose exactly).
63
IQ Chat / Re: Take generic-levitra online no medication
« on: December 15, 2014, 04:21:01 AM »
All I can say to this is:
EDIT: Lool, nice edit on the original comment there admin.
EDIT: Lool, nice edit on the original comment there admin.
64
Banter and Chit-Chat! / Re: Odd Gentlemen's "King's Quest" teaser
« on: December 10, 2014, 01:38:39 PM »
Well, Kosh atleast tries to get different versions of the same game. But then I've seen people who get like 10-20 copies of the same game and all are identical. :/
65
Banter and Chit-Chat! / Re: Everything must cease, RIP my lulu (my wife was murdered today)
« on: December 10, 2014, 06:40:53 AM »
I'm so sorry to hear that Kal! 
The only thing I can suggest is for you to spend time with your daughter, do something together. Maybe go on a long overdue trip?
The only thing I can suggest is for you to spend time with your daughter, do something together. Maybe go on a long overdue trip?
66
Banter and Chit-Chat! / Re: Odd Gentlemen's "King's Quest" teaser
« on: December 09, 2014, 01:26:42 AM »
@Klytos
I like to believe that those people are just very nostalgic. For example, QFI had a refreshing twist to it but it still plays like those good old games, so it's easier for people at those forums to relate to QFI than what this new KQ seems to become according to this trailer.
I like to believe that those people are just very nostalgic. For example, QFI had a refreshing twist to it but it still plays like those good old games, so it's easier for people at those forums to relate to QFI than what this new KQ seems to become according to this trailer.
67
Banter and Chit-Chat! / Re: Odd Gentlemen's "King's Quest" teaser
« on: December 08, 2014, 01:30:27 AM »
Well, the trailer looked so and so in my opinion. While I do believe that The Odd Gentleman aims to do the best game they can, we can't forget that the strings are ultimately being pulled by Activision. So I'm afraid that I have to agree with Mr. Lamb on this one. :/
68
Banter and Chit-Chat! / Re: Adventure Games
« on: December 03, 2014, 01:22:43 AM »
@Klytos Hahah, that guy. He was really butthurt. Wierd part is, he created that poll, so it's like, you make a poll, but every other answer than your preferred one are wrong?
69
Quest for Infamy / Re: oooh groupees! fun for all and shh its a secret!
« on: November 22, 2014, 10:58:33 AM »
@Blackthorne Is the beta version limited to certain tier backers or is it possible for common folk like me also to try it out?
70
IQ Chat / Re: Quest for Glory fan projects
« on: November 16, 2014, 12:58:58 PM »
@Kaldire
Don't worry mate, we all have our own view on the matter that can be different from other views.
(maybe not here but) As I've said it before, you can't compare QFI and Hero-U to the original QFG. QFI wins this fight without a doubt, but that's because Hero-U isn't completed yet. We can do the whole "which one is more like QFG" topic later when Hero-U comes out too. What can be said though is, that Infamous Quests had its' vision planned and they knew what they wanted to do AND knew that the fans would also love it. As for Hero-U (and this is my own opinion), I get the feeling that they weren't quite sure what they wanted to do. If you know what they originally planned with Hero-U, you'd know that it's completely different from what it is right now and what the fans were hoping for back then. That caused a sort of a "development-hell" in the very early stages of the game creation. They had to change their planned vision and recreate the whole thing. I won't go into more in-depth details because you can read more about the various changes made from the start of Kickstarter to now from Hero-U.net yourself.
And yes, as Klytos said it and as the Coles themselves said it, Hero-U will be more of an RPG than an adventure game compared to QFG that was the opposite. I think if anyone was expecting a classic QFG from Hero-U, they were stuck in an Erana's dream (the good ones at the start before they got bad).
There, I think this should take some of that "bashing" off of you Kaldire.
Don't worry mate, we all have our own view on the matter that can be different from other views.
(maybe not here but) As I've said it before, you can't compare QFI and Hero-U to the original QFG. QFI wins this fight without a doubt, but that's because Hero-U isn't completed yet. We can do the whole "which one is more like QFG" topic later when Hero-U comes out too. What can be said though is, that Infamous Quests had its' vision planned and they knew what they wanted to do AND knew that the fans would also love it. As for Hero-U (and this is my own opinion), I get the feeling that they weren't quite sure what they wanted to do. If you know what they originally planned with Hero-U, you'd know that it's completely different from what it is right now and what the fans were hoping for back then. That caused a sort of a "development-hell" in the very early stages of the game creation. They had to change their planned vision and recreate the whole thing. I won't go into more in-depth details because you can read more about the various changes made from the start of Kickstarter to now from Hero-U.net yourself.
And yes, as Klytos said it and as the Coles themselves said it, Hero-U will be more of an RPG than an adventure game compared to QFG that was the opposite. I think if anyone was expecting a classic QFG from Hero-U, they were stuck in an Erana's dream (the good ones at the start before they got bad).
There, I think this should take some of that "bashing" off of you Kaldire.
71
IQ Chat / Re: Any plans on a sequel? And any new patches?
« on: November 13, 2014, 01:13:53 AM »
@Klytos Well, I didn't really mean adventure games because most if not all of them tend to be cheaper. I usually buy my games, but then there are those big triple-A titles that barely lower their price, so that's when me sealegs become active and I plunder the booty forcefully.
72
IQ Chat / Re: Any plans on a sequel? And any new patches?
« on: November 12, 2014, 05:18:10 PM »
I'd like to touch the piracy topic just a little bit.
I'm perfectly fine with the model of Quest for Infamy. You get to play a demo and then decide whether you want to buy it or not.
However, this type of a structure is very rare these days, now instead of demos we get "Preorder now for 5% discount and a hat!", but you won't get to TRY OUT the game itself. That's why, mainly with big costly titles, if I'm not too certain about the game, I prefer to pirate it first and see if I like it. If I do, then I'll actually buy it too.
Say what you will, but I'm not the person who can afford to spend 40-60 bucks here and there all the time as if it were pennies, so I'm glad that as a PC gamer, I have the option to try a potentially interesting game if I'm not given the chance.
I'm perfectly fine with the model of Quest for Infamy. You get to play a demo and then decide whether you want to buy it or not.
However, this type of a structure is very rare these days, now instead of demos we get "Preorder now for 5% discount and a hat!", but you won't get to TRY OUT the game itself. That's why, mainly with big costly titles, if I'm not too certain about the game, I prefer to pirate it first and see if I like it. If I do, then I'll actually buy it too.
Say what you will, but I'm not the person who can afford to spend 40-60 bucks here and there all the time as if it were pennies, so I'm glad that as a PC gamer, I have the option to try a potentially interesting game if I'm not given the chance.
73
Banter and Chit-Chat! / Re: Jodorowskys dune and how I used to love dune the movie now I cant watch it!
« on: November 12, 2014, 11:09:41 AM »
Pat ahead, you guys and girls deserve it. 
74
Banter and Chit-Chat! / Re: HAHAHA steam bg of rohem going for 178$ usd ! LOLOL
« on: November 11, 2014, 04:35:57 PM »
ive posted this way and typed this way since college when you dont have the time to properly edit text
You could always return later on when you have the time to edit it though.
75
Banter and Chit-Chat! / Re: Politics: Rock the vote!!!
« on: November 08, 2014, 04:12:53 PM »
@Chadly
Ahh, you seem to have misspelled my name there, but you can very well see from my profile page that I'm from Mordavia.
But in all seriousness, it's Estonia.
Well that's an easy thing to answer. The Soviets didn't give a damn about casualties, many people lost their lives by being naught but cannon fodder (it was probably like that for many countries, but especially for the soviets).
Yep. *cough* Few years back *cough* a certain financial crisis. *cough*
(Throws oil into fire) xD
Ahh, you seem to have misspelled my name there, but you can very well see from my profile page that I'm from Mordavia.
But in all seriousness, it's Estonia.
The Soviets lost 20 million men fighting the Germans vs the US at 400000.
Well that's an easy thing to answer. The Soviets didn't give a damn about casualties, many people lost their lives by being naught but cannon fodder (it was probably like that for many countries, but especially for the soviets).
All joking aside their is much to be learned from history and those who don't study it are forced to repeat it.
The USA has many faults but many great things about it as well.....Nuff said.
Yep. *cough* Few years back *cough* a certain financial crisis. *cough*
(Throws oil into fire) xD